..........

vincecharus

..........

C9.99

菲林始終係多左d粒粒……

SS.LEICA

mm

toys_madman

C9.99 發表於 2014-5-29 12:49
菲林始終係多左d粒粒……

MM同黑白菲林已經好接近...

skha818

toys_madman 發表於 2014-5-29 13:20
MM同黑白菲林已經好接近...

so why spend much more mony to mimic what we actully want...?~

LanLan

I prefer film more, the texture and microcontrast cant be easily mimicked using post-processing technique  

raumplan

I think the advantage of MM is not to mimic film, both has its merits.
having said that I am now too lazy to shoot film....

Pandachief

Film is film.... but digital is really very convienient and better high ISO.

But film is about the touch and feel and texture and mood.

Also, it is not a fair comparison... try use a older lens such as 8 elements. The charm of film will be even more charming...

bubu

Each to its own.

kgv

大婆 與 小三
點比

kunobun

呢個review令我覺得MM好得！

redrede

要上網睇film既digital版就已經唔公平，同120比都得啦

有放大機睇detail，你個digital細佬仲唔死

Jeansky

still love film more!!!!!!!!!!!!!

feipo

Jeansky 發表於 2014-5-29 20:46
still love film more!!!!!!!!!!!!!

me too!!!!!

vincecharus

..........

ww129

Analogue vs digital 这问题在 HiFi 世界里也谈论不止，正如很多人（包括我在内）都认为黑胶唱片的音色、肉地、厚润都比数码音乐优秀、耐听。经过这么多年科技发展，数码音乐始终离不开数码味，与从真实乐器或 analogue 媒介发出来的声音总有分别。至于那一个较好就是见仁见智的问题，或许说各有长短，可互補不足的地方。相机也应该与此类同。

redrede

ww129 發表於 2014-5-29 22:29
Analogue vs digital 这问题在 HiFi 世界里也谈论不止，正如很多人（包括我在内）都认为黑胶唱片的音色、肉 ...

係音樂，數碼跟現塲音樂未經數碼化(唔係講红館嗰D) 就跟本冇得比，vibration 嗰種厚度做唔晒出黎，當然如果你只求完美音準就最好數碼化

菲林都一樣，除咗質素，我哋要既係感覺同味道，因為我哋唔係攝影記者交功課

mitcha

redrede 發表於 2014-5-29 22:51
菲林都一樣，除咗質素，我哋要既係感覺同味道，因為我哋唔係攝影記者交功課

冇錯
最緊要影得開心

hothmonkey

我唔理digital同film分別有幾大，我鐘意film多D。
原因係：我影得開心D

ww129

redrede 發表於 2014-5-29 22:51
係音樂，數碼跟現塲音樂未經數碼化(唔係講红館嗰D) 就跟本冇得比，vibration 嗰種厚度做唔晒出黎，當然如 ...

Very well said.