|
發表於 2013-11-8 15:23:07
|
顯示全部樓層
本帖最後由 vincecharus 於 2013-11-8 15:24 編輯
I got used to MM after only about one month of using it. People say it has the same sensor as M9's, but they don't behave exactly in the same way. In my experience, MM has more dynamic range than M9, particular in highlight. Most of my MM pics so far do not use the whole MM dynamic range towards the highlight end, while most of my M9 pics so far needs almost the entire M9 dynamic range (including some clipping).
For high resolution, in my experience M9 has about one more stop of usable high ISO than M9, usable up to about ISO 1250 (comparing with ISO 640 with M9). If grain is not a major concern, I have taken usable pictures at ISO 6400. ISO 6400 + f/1.4 is a very potent combination in extreme low light, as long as one can still focus properly with the rangefinder.
MM will be my main camera for a long time to come (at least next 2-3 years). M9 will be my backup camera for color shots.
So far, I can't think of anything really bad to say about MM. All cameras have strengths and weaknesses, but MM suits me really well. When I use it, I stop thinking about cameras and lenses and stuff but instead focus on taking pictures. For me, that's the ultimate proof of successful camera design!
**************************************************************************************************
MM + 90/2AA (ISO 6400, f/2, 1/180s) |
本帖子中包含更多資源
您需要 登錄 才可以下載或查看,沒有帳號?立即註冊
x
|