你認為咩先叫靚相?

lc7535

我觉得冲激感很重要，可从美感的和故事性两方面，都有最好。至於散景是用来参考買镜的。

bubu

redrede 發表於 2014-2-17 13:35
Maybe I read it out this way

If you are looking at 10 different photos, how do you rate them and wh ...

Since photography is an art, I don't think one can easily single out an element that forms most part of this art.

It has to be a combination of multiple elements, mixed in an expected but aesthetic way not seen before.

As we all are familiar with, there are many, many "raw" elements in photographic art. From lighting to camera angle, color tone to DOF, contents to composition...

They are just like the colour particles in a kaleidoscope.

The skill and judgement is to pick a few of these particles and turn them to form your wonderful patterns.  

Jeansky

景有景o既準則
人像有人像準則
人文有人文o既準則

我vote 第一個

Kym

識得講故事的相, 就是好圖.

vincecharus

redrede 發表於 2014-2-17 14:12
Yes, so I'm only asking 你最鍾意食乜野

好食的都鍾意食，所以要靠個廚的功夫和創意啦！

Kanedias

A good photo is one that draws you in, makes you stop and ponder.

4466

咩先叫靚相? love it from the first sight....it always enter my mind

imojo

Agree with Kanedias and others that a great photo leads the eyes from the peripheral to the subject.  The peripheral must be interesting enough to draw the viewer to the subject and the subject must complete the story. I prefer fluid motion (or idea of) over static posed photos.

vincecharus

好相唔一定靚，靚相唔一定好

靚相，好似靚女甘，可以靚得好有深度，也可以靚得好膚淺。當然，膚淺的多啦...

好多廣告相都系靚相，不過唔一定系好相...

redrede

vincecharus 發表於 2014-2-19 08:57
好相唔一定靚，靚相唔一定好

靚相，好似靚女甘，可以靚得好有深度，也可以靚得好膚淺。當然，膚淺的多啦.. ...

Haha Vincecharus Hing going very deep discussion here.....

At the moment just focus on what photo catch your eyes more, you may include a theme, not a must to make a nice photo

So yes I'm only asking about 靚相, too far and too broad on 好相 without a good question to start with. Maybe in another thread.

So all I say I prefer nature beauty, not a photoshopped one

vincecharus

redrede 發表於 2014-2-19 09:24
Haha Vincecharus Hing going very deep discussion here.....

At the moment just focus on what photo  ...

離題講，如果一幅相好淨系靠靚，就好似一個女仔好淨系靠靚，甘真系要好靚先得勒

redrede

vincecharus 發表於 2014-2-19 11:32
離題講，如果一幅相好淨系靠靚，就好似一個女仔好淨系靠靚，甘真系要好靚先得勒
...

膚淺啲講，出街現到靚女望多兩眼，有時真是冇想過去問個名. 已經冇識女仔好久啦

vincecharus

redrede 發表於 2014-2-19 14:42
膚淺啲講，出街現到靚女望多兩眼，有時真是冇想過去問個名. 已經冇識女仔好久啦 ...

甘樣既要求，很多 commercial photography 都做得唔錯吖

redrede

vincecharus 發表於 2014-2-19 14:58
甘樣既要求，很多 commercial photography 都做得唔錯吖

其他人唔清楚，我個人要求好簡單，冇PhotoShop 又唔係一個景或post影十幾次再拿出最好個張，完全一take過記錄一"克"既靚相，無論電子相或菲林相，就巳經好靚又表現到技術心思
其他師兄我就好奇想知所以我咪出題問下

commercial photography 都做到就抵佢哋賺到兩餐飯食

vincecharus

redrede 發表於 2014-2-19 18:00
其他人唔清楚，我個人要求好簡單，冇PhotoShop 又唔係一個景或post影十幾次再拿出最好個張，完全 ...

"完全一take過記錄一"克"既靚相"

種種原因，其實好難

vincecharus

redrede 發表於 2014-2-19 18:00
其他人唔清楚，我個人要求好簡單，冇PhotoShop 又唔係一個景或post影十幾次再拿出最好個張，完全 ...

又話時話，而家做 events，有不少影樓用 jpeg 直出立即打印給賓客留念，有些預先教好燈位，有些連燈位都無，如果做得好，效果差強人意，算OK

甘算唔算好野？

bubu

redrede 發表於 2014-2-19 18:00
其他人唔清楚，我個人要求好簡單，冇PhotoShop 又唔係一個景或post影十幾次再拿出最好個張，完全 ...

哗，呢个簡单要求好高难度喎！

bubu

HCB...Capa...都唔会影一张就收band呀！

Jason

如果影commercial，肯定影唔止一張，分分鐘影一百幾廿張，甚至更多先僅一張。

不過話說回來，以前教我影相的老師，就影咗一輯相叫 "one shot only"，佢用45機+Polaroid type 55影人，每次只影一張。

redrede

vincecharus 發表於 2014-2-19 18:13
又話時話，而家做 events，有不少影樓用 jpeg 直出立即打印給賓客留念，有些預先教好燈位，有些連燈位都 ...

最基本主人家收貨先啦，不過好難，又要張纸質靚，又要打印出好，所以現場嗰D全部細相，都是只是留來纪念，就算世界小姐係度你都睇唔出啦，睇唔到咩我又唔敢講靚唔靚