你D鏡有幾多歲??

redrede

bubu 發表於 2014-2-28 23:13
顺便問下，有冇Elmar 5cm/3.5 11 o'clock係1933之前嘅呢？

我有支Elmar，揾匀全支鏡都睇唔到s/n，唔通係假 ...

聽過話嗰時未必支支有sn

bubu

redrede 發表於 2014-3-1 00:17
聽過話嗰時未必支支有sn

咁...佢係真Elmar嘅話，就起碼80歲囉！

YingHo

toys_madman 發表於 2014-2-28 16:29
summar正啊!! 不過依家要搵好狀態幾乎冇可能...

對呀，始終係戰前野，我搵到支得少少hairline算係咁

toys_madman

YingHo 發表於 2014-3-1 11:08
對呀，始終係戰前野，我搵到支得少少hairline算係咁

你睇交易咁耐都未出過就知！

kgv

bubu 發表於 2014-2-28 23:13
顺便問下，有冇Elmar 5cm/3.5 11 o'clock係1933之前嘅呢？

我有支Elmar，揾匀全支鏡都睇唔到s/n，唔通係假 ...

咩喺 11 o'clock ?

Jeansky

toys_madman 發表於 2014-3-1 17:16
你睇交易咁耐都未出過就知！

我有枝月球特別版

toys_madman

Jeansky 發表於 2014-3-1 19:36
我有枝月球特別版

咩喺 月球特別版 ?

Jeansky

toys_madman 發表於 2014-3-2 00:43
咩喺 月球特別版 ?

花到似月球表面咁！

toys_madman

Jeansky 發表於 2014-3-2 01:09
花到似月球表面咁！

正喎！

bubu

kgv 發表於 2014-3-1 19:10
咩喺 11 o'clock ?

一般Elmar 50，包括Red Scale, Diamond Mark...等版本，扭尽infinity時，粒"把手的"停在機身7時位置，並有锁。
這個停在11時位置，無鎖，靠條柱顶住。

imojo

I have similar 11 o'clock nickel 50 f3.5 with no sn and infinity lock and F=50mm. (The back flange has a "o" indicating conversion of a non-standard lens to standard mount.) According to
www.flickr.com/photos/kay_burn_lim/6909680492/
the lens may be pre-1928. This make my oldest lens 85 years old. My youngest is 13. most of my RF lenses are 50 to 55.

kgv

bubu 發表於 2014-3-2 14:13
一般Elmar 50，包括Red Scale, Diamond Mark...等版本，扭尽infinity時，粒"把手的"停在機身7時位置，並 ...

Thank you!

我新買了兩支 50 Nickel Elmar, 一支上了 LTM->M adaptor 之後就在 lock 位 "kick"住。
一喺就 鬆開 先落 adaptor, 咁就用到，但就 lock 唔到。
等我明天 check check 先。

bubu

imojo 發表於 2014-3-2 14:42
I have similar 11 o'clock nickel 50 f3.5 with no sn and infinity lock and F=50mm. (The back flange h ...

I don't see an "o".

Can you post a picture showing where it is supposed to be? Thanks.

bubu

kgv 發表於 2014-3-2 15:41
Thank you!

我新買了兩支 50 Nickel Elmar, 一支上了 LTM->M adaptor 之後就在 lock 位 "kick"住。

用Leica原裝adaptor，应该没有这个kick住問题。

聽講用Voigtlander Type-I都唔会kick。

但Voigtlander Type-II、即現行版，一定会。除非用銼磨细條边。
其他牌子adaptor得唔得我就唔知了。

bubu

附图是Type-II，就係條边闊左，响打圈个位顶住粒"把手的"，按不下、解唔到鎖 (或扭唔埋去尽infinity)。

imojo

bubu 發表於 2014-3-2 16:52
I don't see an "o".

Can you post a picture showing where it is supposed to be? Thanks.

Do not have photo available, easier to show one from *bay. Note that this lens has s/n scribed inside of tubing. Mine does not have any scribed number. I also have a nickel 35 3.5 with no s/n and no "o" on back flange. I also wondered if the keeper ring with the s/n was replaced with one with a blank ring. Let me know if your lens has a "o" on the back of the mounting flange. If none, then Leica may not have had used "o" on all non-standard to standard mount conversions.


http://www.kevincameras.com/gall ... N4019+copy.jpg.html

bubu

imojo 發表於 2014-3-2 18:37
Do not have photo available, easier to show one from *bay. Note that this lens has s/n scribed ins ...

Mine doesn't have the "o" or s/n scribed inside the tube.

imojo

bubu 發表於 2014-3-2 18:57
Mine doesn't have the "o" or s/n scribed inside the tube.

Your lens has all indications of pre-1932 and a conversion.